PsiPog.net

About Me

My name is Sean Connelly, and I've gone by the pseudo-name Peebrain while on PsiPog.net. This blog was a running stream of my thoughts, beliefs, and experiences about PsiPog and psychic abilities in general.

Saturday, January 21, 2006

PsiPog Updates

Well, there are basically two updates.

1. Finally got the media up from JoeT. Two awesome videos of him doing macro-PK.
2. Finally scheduled a new PK Party. And in doing so, I realized that I didn't post the results of the previous PK Party (in Feb of 2005) on the Features page. I'll have to do that.

PsiPog has been dieing down lately. I think the problem is lack of new information. And while I enjoy helping newbies, I don't like how PsiPog almost exclusivly attracts newbies. I believe the reason for this is because I target the articles towards newbies. Now there's a benefit to that - they're so simple that anyone can understand them. That's a very nice quality. However, at the same time, if I want to attract more intelligent and advanced people, then I need to write more intelligent and advanced articles.

Now we come to an interesting point. Do I write articles so simple a newbie could understand it? Or do I write intelligent and advanced articles that make the audience think? I believe the answer is: BOTH! At the same time .

A lot is dependant on the new PsiPog backend, and the result of my next eBook. Two large projects that are coming to an end very soon. The next eBook talks about a LOT of completely new ideas ("new" as in they haven't been discussed on PsiPog), and it's been a challenge for me to write.

I believe the reason PsiPog is dieing down is because I am dieing down. Does that mean PsiPog will go away? No, not at all. I am becoming very bored and tired of psi balls, constructs, and all the typical answers to all the typical questions. As I present in my next eBook, I think it's time for PsiPog to address some important topics, that require serious thinking. The only thing I fear is that a lot of people don't want to hear the things I'm going to be saying, and possibly think I'm crazy .

If I am presenting a drastic change, then a lot of people won't like it. That's a fact. However, there will be a smaller porition that does like it. And with that drastic change, I will begin to attract different kinds of visitors to the website.

I personally think it's a change for the better (obviously). This change doesn't require us to throw out all the older articles, it just makes us think about the older articles in different ways.

How exciting, hm?

~Sean

Saturday, January 21, 2006, 1:10 PM — 4 comments

4 Comments:

On January 21, 2006 4:13 PM, PadmeKO said...: We're behind ya Peebrain! I think psi may be dying down because some people may feel discouraged-like there's no way they can do anything huge with these skills. But whatever the case, there are still some people out there dedicated to improving. I'm sure that many of them will eventually find PsiPog.
On January 21, 2006 8:33 PM, Chris King said...: yeah, like padmeko said. I have pointed like 300 people (literally) to Psi-Links and in turn have come here. You may not see it because they dont sign up but a lot of people look at psipog for the first time each day. Keep it going and I will back you up 100% on everything! I owe you my life style now because psipog is the place that changed it forever. I can now do all sorts of abilities because of what you have done. THANK YOU SO MUCH and if there is anything you would like me to do for some reason, i will do it without a hesitation.
On January 24, 2006 12:00 AM, Chickens_go_quack said...: Change is good. I'll probably enjoy any NEW ideassince I'm an open-minded kinda guy ;)
On February 09, 2006 4:49 AM, SlippedInsane said...: It would be great to see some new content that is not just the "do this kiddies" sort of style. More theoretical / intellectual articles would be a welcome change :D
If there is any help you need to make said changes, just ask!

PsiPog.net

About Me

Previous Posts

Saturday, January 21, 2006

PsiPog Updates

4 Comments: