PsiPog.net

Science is EvolvingHomeArticlesQ&AArchiveMediaLinksSearch

View topic - Particle Theory

PsiPog.net Forum Index » Modern Sciences » Particle Theory

Goto page Previous  1, 2

Particle Theory
Author Message
Posted on Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:10 pm

sgtpsion

Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 425

Birth-switching I'm not too bothered about. I'm looking at the nature of Psi (the mechanism of parapsychological effects).
Back to top
Posted on Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:26 pm

freakinrican626

Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 514

Quote:
mutant proteins


who says they have to be mutant?

if you look at early hominoids, they began developing language (of course). We can presume that this is a primitive language and not as 'advanced' as our own. If we have communicational issues with our modern languages, wouldn't it seem that they had a shitload of trouble back then with their primitive? I can imagine so.
What could make up for this? I think telepathy could have been a skill mroe commonly developed back them to make up for their primitive language.
So going along with this theory (not fact), since natural selection will keep traits that will continue the reproduction of a species, telepathy could just a normal gene. Since our language has developed better and we have not really needed telepathy, it seems to be a rarer trait than having blue eyes.

Basically what I was just saying with that, that if telepathy is a hereditary trait, it wouldn't be caused by a mutant gene.
Back to top
Posted on Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:02 pm

Tankdown

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 688

Yes but that really does circle around the hereditary trait deal. I think it could be a royal trait that got stronger from the alpha male of the group always overcoming the commoners.

So if its royal, its not common so in a way its a mutant trait.

But alpha males always do have more children do they? This is just a idea I thought to throw out.

O well. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
Posted on Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:07 pm

Niushirra

Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 299

freakinrican626 wrote:
Quote:
mutant proteins


who says they have to be mutant?

if you look at early hominoids, they began developing language (of course). We can presume that this is a primitive language and not as 'advanced' as our own. If we have communicational issues with our modern languages, wouldn't it seem that they had a shitload of trouble back then with their primitive? I can imagine so.
What could make up for this? I think telepathy could have been a skill mroe commonly developed back them to make up for their primitive language.
So going along with this theory (not fact), since natural selection will keep traits that will continue the reproduction of a species, telepathy could just a normal gene. Since our language has developed better and we have not really needed telepathy, it seems to be a rarer trait than having blue eyes.

Basically what I was just saying with that, that if telepathy is a hereditary trait, it wouldn't be caused by a mutant gene.
He's saying that a select group of individuals have more powerful psi than others based on genes thus they do not have wild type genes.
Back to top

Goto page Previous  1, 2

PsiPog.net Forum Index » Modern Sciences » Particle Theory