PsiPog.net

Science is EvolvingHomeArticlesQ&AArchiveMediaLinksSearch

View topic - Human Evolution?

PsiPog.net Forum Index » Modern Sciences » Human Evolution?

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Human Evolution?
Poll: Do you think that psi is or will be the next stage of human evolution?
Yes
42%
42% [ 34 ]
No
22%
22% [ 18 ]
Maybe
23%
23% [ 19 ]
"Evolution?"
11%
11% [ 9 ]
Total Votes : 80
Author Message
Posted on Fri Aug 25, 2006 7:28 pm

Roy

Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 416

I always find it funny when people argue about religious belief, particularly because they tend to project onto each other thoughts, emotions, and motivations in order to weaken the argument of their opponent. Ad hominem and strawman, the gruesome-twosome of any debate.
Back to top
Posted on Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:44 pm

Tankdown

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 688

I always find it funny that anyone thinks that they could be right.

It's why I say I could be wrong.

lol
Back to top
Posted on Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:13 pm

Lightbringer

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 293

Roy wrote:
I always find it funny when people argue about religious belief, particularly because they tend to project onto each other thoughts, emotions, and motivations in order to weaken the argument of their opponent. Ad hominem and strawman, the gruesome-twosome of any debate.


I find it particularly funny that people believe they are any less likely to succumb to using that "gruesome-twosome" because they are NOT religious.
Back to top
Posted on Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:42 pm

Roy

Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 416

Lightbringer wrote:
Roy wrote:
I always find it funny when people argue about religious belief, particularly because they tend to project onto each other thoughts, emotions, and motivations in order to weaken the argument of their opponent. Ad hominem and strawman, the gruesome-twosome of any debate.


I find it particularly funny that people believe they are any less likely to succumb to using that "gruesome-twosome" because they are NOT religious.


Sure they can. Both fallacies are within the grasp of anyone in an argument or debate. I will laugh with you at the hilarity of it all.
Back to top
Posted on Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:11 pm

Niushirra

Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 299

Umm, do only mutants use psi? Does psi help the user reproduce better or survive longer to reproduce better? The answer to both questions is no thus it is not evolution. Get your definitions right.
Back to top
Posted on Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:29 pm

Roy

Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 416

Yeah no shit. I said this like two pages back. Of course it gets ignored.
Back to top
Posted on Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:36 pm

Niushirra

Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 299

Roy wrote:
Yeah no shit. I said this like two pages back. Of course it gets ignored.
Yeah, sorry, I don't feel like reading four pages of usually idiotic stuff either. I can really find smarter kids than this in an inner city baltimore highschool biology class.
Back to top
Posted on Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:10 pm

Tankdown

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 688

Niushirra wrote:
Yeah, sorry, I don't feel like reading four pages of usually idiotic stuff either. I can really find smarter kids than this in an inner city baltimore highschool biology class.


Indeed no one likes doing that, but ignoreing it donest really help. The one thing I don't like about some groups is that some tend to not to listen to other groups. There is many form of intellegence but you have to listen for it first. You sound like a smart person but harsh words are bond to get harsh reactions, that is untill one side decides to end it.
Back to top
Posted on Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:04 am

dutchlike

Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 76

*ignores what's said on the other pages (hey...at least i'm honest Laughing ) *
Well...i thikn it is the next step of evolution Very Happy
Back to top
Posted on Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:52 pm

Niushirra

Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 299

Tankdown wrote:
Niushirra wrote:
Yeah, sorry, I don't feel like reading four pages of usually idiotic stuff either. I can really find smarter kids than this in an inner city baltimore highschool biology class.


Indeed no one likes doing that, but ignoreing it donest really help. The one thing I don't like about some groups is that some tend to not to listen to other groups. There is many form of intellegence but you have to listen for it first. You sound like a smart person but harsh words are bond to get harsh reactions, that is untill one side decides to end it.
Sorry but I'm mean to everyone. I know I shouldn't ignore it but I do. If I actually read it all I would probably have to respong to some of it and infest the topic with even more flame.
Back to top
Posted on Thu Sep 21, 2006 12:05 am

IBuckFufalos

Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 22

I don't love reading so i got though three pages before i almost fell asleep even though it was intresting, so hope this isnt too off topic.

I think I will be flamed but don't belive evolution I don't think we were once monkeys or any of that stuff. I do belive that we are able to adapte to our enviorment at a small rate. I am new to pis have barly made pis-balls but even the person who thought up evolution didn't he even say that we were to complexed to evolve somthing had to make us? So he thought up some alien thing.


PS: Carbon dating is not reliable.

-I never have been good at spelling and grammer, first time realy tried to typ well on the internet.

Sorry if im bring up dead topic.
-The Fufalo Bucker
Back to top
Posted on Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:46 am

JOHNNYBEGOOD

Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 354

IBuckFufalos wrote:
I don't love reading so i got though three pages before i almost fell asleep even though it was intresting, so hope this isnt too off topic.

I think I will be flamed but don't belive evolution I don't think we were once monkeys or any of that stuff. I do belive that we are able to adapte to our enviorment at a small rate. I am new to pis have barly made pis-balls but even the person who thought up evolution didn't he even say that we were to complexed to evolve somthing had to make us? So he thought up some alien thing.
No, some conservative think-tank said that. There is nothing in our bodies that could not have been developed through evolution. The first eye was nothing more than a patch of light-sensitive cells. Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean you should make a logical jump like that.


buffalo fucker wrote:
PS: Carbon dating is not reliable.
Sure, it's not reliable enough to pinpoint the exact date and time of something, but it's definitely reliable enough to measure how old fossils are. Who's feeding you this nonsense?
Back to top
Posted on Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:11 pm

Lightbringer

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 293

JOHNNYBEGOOD wrote:
Sure, it's not reliable enough to pinpoint the exact date and time of something, but it's definitely reliable enough to measure how old fossils are. Who's feeding you this nonsense?


Creationists and ID proponents of course! Razz I'm a teleologist myself but that, along with every other "side" of the debate are spiritual standpoints, not scientific ones. I find that is often the case with those who are believe in materialist evolution as well as creationists, etc...
Back to top
Posted on Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:24 pm

IBuckFufalos

Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 22

When i say carbon dating is not reliable i dont me exact dating im talking about i could never be proven that it works.

People have taken and carbon dated a turtle (alive) from the sea and the dating said he was millons of years old.

People have burying and object (bone, shell, and other things) in their back yard then sent to be carbon dated after a few years in ground and they came out to be like 600,00 years old.

PS: Why did you call me buffalo fucker?
Back to top
Posted on Thu Sep 21, 2006 10:50 pm

Tankdown

Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 688

When I think of evolution I think of horeseshoe crabs in canada. Very Happy

I'm not saying I believe in anything right now, just wanted to say that.
Back to top

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

PsiPog.net Forum Index » Modern Sciences » Human Evolution?