PsiPog.net Forum Index » Modern Sciences » is it so hard?
is it so hard? | |||
Author | Message | ||
---|---|---|---|
Posted on Sat May 27, 2006 5:52 am | |||
Eidolon
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 |
I wouldn't dare to say that, even tough there are things like psi who would break some laws it wouldn't make the whole physic science useless. I mean we've achieved so much over those years the majority HAS to be correct just think about nuclear reactors or computers. |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Sat May 27, 2006 3:34 pm | |||
moshe
Joined: 28 Apr 2006 |
Well I didn?t say this either. Besides, who knows, maybe all the laws we know now are 100% right but the problem is that MAYBE we don?t know all of them ![]() And when I say rethinking I mean looking again on the assumptions that were made when the physics theories were build. Yes I know that those were proven right by experiments, but maybe there are other forces that in normal conditions are neutral or constant (lets say the forces that are "psi" and not only), that way all the experiments will show the same unless you find a way to change those other forces when you want (by will). For example there is Albert Veynik about whom I wrote in the scepticism ? My Pyramid Experiment post by peebrain, in his book "Thermodynamics of real processes " he assumes that some laws/assumptions of thermodynamics are not correct and if that is so many phenomenon that by those couldn?t be true now could be explained. P.S: I didn?t read the book just the prologue so don?t ask me to say how he proves anything. And I doubt that I have enough knowledge in physics to understand what he says. Maybe in 2 or 3 years I will if I decide to take relevant courses in my university |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Tue May 30, 2006 7:28 am | |||
windguardian
Joined: 21 Jan 2006 |
You know... even Albert Einstein, whos theories are beyond normal human comprehension, are wrong in some way. Physicists are those kind of scienctist that gleefully knock down a theory, however long it's history, in favour of a better one that could better explain the workings of nature and the mysteries of the universe. Just look at Newton, most of his laws are crap on the atomic level...
Physicist have no other common goal other than the Theory of Everything, which is supposedly able to define, explain and predict all things in the universe... So when they found that Newton's law is inconsistent with the space-time theory, they scrapped it and replace it with Einstein's Curved Space-Time Gravity. And now that they discovered Quantum Gravity, they dismissed Eintein's Theory as well, because the Quantum Theory better explains some phenomena they don't understand. So, eventually, they will come to a point where they realise something deeper, that is capable of explaining the psi phenomena with flawless logic, and they will say: hey, isn't this the stuff those absent-minded psedo-scientists are trying to do all along? And voila, psionics become a branch of applied physics...lol As they say, Physics is the King of Science, and it attempts to explain all that happens in the universe. But ironically, the scienctist that have done research on psi are mostly medical people, which are truly adept in terms of bodily functions and human physiology, but they often lack the understanding of physics to make a connection somehow... since it would be rediculous to suggest that homo-sapiens are the only organism in the wole universe with special access to this kind of power. Maybe if Einstein is born in the 21st century, he would be a psion himself, "My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind."- Einstein. |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:49 am | |||
MikauZora
Joined: 17 Jun 2006 |
then we would need to start using occlumency ![]() anyway, i wonder how would it be on schools.... and universities too... how would you prevent one of your students of telling the other one the tests results, and stuff? or for someone to "copy/paste" the other guy answers on the university admition tests? maybe some mind/cerebral wave-blocking devices on the rooms, like that ones they use to block cel phones frequencies? it would pull out a big set of stuff!! "protect your thoughts, use wave blocker 3000". think about! or it could just end up in a big mess and there would be no tests on schools anymore ![]() |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:31 pm | |||
electroluv03
Joined: 18 Jan 2006 |
Everything I wanted to say in a nutshell. |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:02 pm | |||
Tankdown
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 |
Love how you knew that so well, ![]() I read in a book before (Three roads to quatumn gravity, by Lee Smolin), that i believe a example in is that book that speaks of Einstein that i agree with. Imagine that the world is a car, now what Einstein given us is the mannel to work the car. But not how the car works in gernal. We can use Einsteins work to explain things on our scale of the universe. Even string, loop, and expansion theory have there flaws. Even Einstein died trieing to find a GUT. Newton was indeed flawed but his works are still useful. Physics is indeed king ![]() However I must add is that its impossible to know everything in the universe. Seeing we are the pawn on the chessboard. Hehehe for example light shinning off metal is still a phemoena |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:43 pm | |||
JOHNNYBEGOOD
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 |
For those of you who enjoy citing 'research' by 'scientists', read Pants' post here:
http://www.psipog.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3414&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=102 |
||
Back to top |
PsiPog.net Forum Index » Modern Sciences » is it so hard?
All Content, Images, Video, Text, and Software is © Copyright 2000-2006 PsiPog.net and their respective authors. All Rights Reserved.
You must agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy to view this website. Click here to contact the webmaster.