PsiPog.net Forum Index » Psychokinesis » Valid -Kinesis Terms! Read or your messages might be deleted
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next
Valid -Kinesis Terms! Read or your messages might be deleted | |||
Author | Message | ||
---|---|---|---|
Posted on Sat Apr 22, 2006 2:06 pm | |||
Apollo
Joined: 17 Jan 2006 |
If you see my point then you should understand why the topic was locked. To teach people not to talk about it, you need to show them to stop it. That is human nature too.
As for the categorizing things: it is just like a square is a rectangle but a rectangle is not a square. "Pyrokinesis" is psychokinesis but psychokinesis is not "pyrokinesis". Mainly, our point of the rule about no (insert name)kinesis is to teach people not to use other kinesis terms and to realize that it is just psychokinesis. |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Sat Apr 22, 2006 7:19 pm | |||
Rahmid
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 |
And anyway just saying pyro PK, or dirt PK is alot shorter then the fluff versions.
But it's all PK, saying it's not is untrue, and that is what is being stopped. Rahimd |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:35 pm | |||
Aurafire
Joined: 05 Jun 2006 |
Is forumokinesis an acceptable term in talking about moving from a temp forum to a perma forum? | ||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:09 pm | |||
Apollo
Joined: 17 Jan 2006 |
if that was an attempt to be funny, you failed. Take it to the general discussion "Make-Your-Own-Kinesis" thread. | ||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Fri Jun 09, 2006 1:18 am | |||
Aurafire
Joined: 05 Jun 2006 |
Shoot, you got me. I was hoping it would make Mr. Peebrain smile, but I don't know if that'll happen, he looks pretty angry in his avatar. |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:04 pm | |||
Draken_
Joined: 11 Jun 2006 |
But Peebrain...In one or your articles, didn't you state that moving the psi wheel with a tornado-like manipulation of energy would be considered Aerokinesis? | ||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Tue Jun 13, 2006 10:45 pm | |||
Peebrain
Site Admin |
Yes, I do. And that article will eventually be edited, but until then, you are free to call me a hypocrite. It was written a few years ago, when we were less strict on terms. Nonetheless, you're correct.
~Sean |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:53 pm | |||
Draken_
Joined: 11 Jun 2006 |
Oh. Sorry. I don't read the dates on posts too often. I'm not calling you a hypocrite, I just thought you forgot it. |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Fri Jun 23, 2006 2:30 pm | |||
Woodpecker
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 |
Do you mean 'prefixes'? ![]() |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:41 am | |||
silentscream
Joined: 13 Jul 2006 |
Peebrain..... c my hole family are witches and shadow forming (shadowkinesis) is another way of doing pk but adding more than 1 type of energy 2 it.................... ![]() |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:43 am | |||
Peebrain
Site Admin |
You're free to use that term with your family then, but on PsiPog, we don't allow random -kinesis words.
~Sean |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Sun Jul 23, 2006 4:43 pm | |||
thegrogen
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 |
Personally, I think that the word "psychotelekinesis" is much more descriptive of the phenomenon.
I mean, think about it; "psychokinesis" is literally "mind-movement", which suggests moving your mind about, not moving things with your mind. And "telekinesis" is literally "far-movement", which is far too vague a term, since we can move stuff without touching them and without using psi (magnetic levitation, etc.). |
||
Back to top | |||
Re: Valid -Kinesis Terms! Read or your messages might be del on Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:44 pm | |||
__
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 |
I find the word 'slang terms' for generally used words funny. Psychokinesis and Telekinesis are both scientifically used terms, both do not mean the same thing, Psychokinesis is a broad category, whereas Telekinesis only has mental interaction(or conjuring, see below) with inanimate objects under itself. Pyro- and Cryokinesis go to the so-called 'magic'(hah.) category, they are elemental types of telekinesis, if used conjuringly, however they still have their own uses away from the telekinesis category. |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Sun Jul 30, 2006 3:03 pm | |||
Personman
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 |
Biologists don't have troubles deciding what is and is not acceptable scientific parlance in biology.
Engineers don't have troubles deciding what is and is not acceptable scientific parlance in engineering. Chemists don't have troubles deciding what is and is not acceptable scientific parlance in chemistry. What do these share in common? Objective, real *cough* systems that can be analyzed because of it. If this is the same as these, then why don't the truths make themselves evident via experimentation the same way to everyone? Hm. |
||
Back to top | |||
Posted on Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:03 pm | |||
Peebrain
Site Admin |
Good question. And while you are hinting that psionics is therefore not "real", I think you should think about alternative explainations. There exist other explainations for this situation (that really aren't that far fetched). ~Sean |
||
Back to top |
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next
PsiPog.net Forum Index » Psychokinesis » Valid -Kinesis Terms! Read or your messages might be deleted
All Content, Images, Video, Text, and Software is © Copyright 2000-2006 PsiPog.net and their respective authors. All Rights Reserved.
You must agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy to view this website. Click here to contact the webmaster.