PsiPog.net

View topic - Valid -Kinesis Terms! Read or your messages might be deleted

PsiPog.net Forum Index » Psychokinesis » Valid -Kinesis Terms! Read or your messages might be deleted

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Valid -Kinesis Terms! Read or your messages might be deleted

Author

Message

Kinesis this kinesis that kinesis... on Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:10 pm

leemcgavinjoey

Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 30

I think there are lots of types of -kinesis'. I just came to add this in because a forum was locked.. Sad

I found this list of kinesis' before and it was really interesting and I've been trying some:
Karyokinesis... Supposedly a way to divide and replicate cells.
Aerokinesis... Wind control
Atmokinesis... Affecting weather
Audiokinesis, Soniokinesis... Mentally controlling sound waves
Biokinesis, Vitakinesis... Mentally altering biology (healing or DNA?)
Chlorokinesis, Xylokinesis, Agrokinesis... Affect growth of plants
Chronokinesis... Affect the [flow of time] or [perception of time]
Cryokinesis... Slowing down molecules oor something to make or manipulate ice?
Electrokinesis... Electricity of course
Geokinesis, Terrakinesis... Affecting earth
Gravitakinesis, Gyrokinesis... Affecting gravitrons or gravitational field
Hydrokinesis... Water
Lygokinesis... Ability to manipulate raw energy
Magnokinesis, Magnetokinesis... Magnetic field
Photokinesis, Lumokinesis... Generate or manipulate photons or light
Radiokinesis... Mentally manipulate the toxic radiation along the electromagnetic spectrum
Technokinesis (sometimes called Cyberkinesis, Technopathy or Cyberpathy)... mentally manipulate technology and/or machines
Telekinesis, Psychokinesis... Duh..
Thermokinesis... Heat, and only heat
Pyrokinesis... Manipulate or generate flame by somehow speeding up molecules
Umbrakinesis... Manipulating shadows
And so on...

Most of these are done with telekinesis, psychokinesis. Some aren't. Such as chronokinesis, where you just manipulate your perception... But it's still interesting... Could be a form of teleportation if you really slow it down a lot... As in almost stopping. I try to keep an open mind...

Re: Kinesis this kinesis that kinesis... on Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:08 pm

klunckmonker

Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 71

leemcgavinjoey wrote:

I think there are lots of types of -kinesis'. I just came to add this in because a forum was locked.. Sad

I found this list of kinesis' before and it was really interesting and I've been trying some:
Karyokinesis... Supposedly a way to divide and replicate cells.

Never heard of that....

If it is real it would seem to be able to remove mutated cancerous cells from people.

Posted on Tue Aug 15, 2006 1:25 pm

Apollo

Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 1589

*stabs eyes out*

You dont have to give examples of all these crap terms. Even though "chronokinesis" is not technically manipulation of matter, it is still a -kinesis term. As the thread shows "Valid -kinesis terms".

Posted on Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:43 pm

leemcgavinjoey

Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 30

*sniff*

Oh well, now we know more! Very Happy

Posted on Sun Oct 29, 2006 3:44 am

Xiam

Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 49

A few things here.

I've still yet to hear of anyone actually using "chronokinesis" in any form, altering someone's perception of time, or time itself. I think it's pretty much impossible.

If you can prove me wrong, please go a week into the future and give me the headline of the New York Times.

And regarding "fuck," I think the origins of the word is highly disputed among entymologists. And I don't think any words are vulgar - some may be a little more intense than others, but sometimes you NEED that, dammit!

And regarding the plural of "kinesis" - if I'm not mistaken, it should actually be KINESES. Because Kinesises has wayyy too many S's, and apostraphes are only use for posessive and in regards to letters (see "S's").

And I think numbers.

Also, to whever argued about the "slang terms" category... in the south, "y'all" is commonly used just as "telekinesis" is commonly used. That doesn't make it any less slang.

Actually, there are many words in common conversation which are slang. I just can't think of any at the moment, but they're there.

And regarding fluffiness... yeah, it's a real problem. Like the person who posted a while ago about having a family of witches, talking about "shadowkinesis" or whatever (I'm pretty sure that'd be "umbrakinesis," though I still tink it's garbage).

You have to think scientifically, m'kay? You cannot alter a shadow without altering the light or the object casting the shadow. Chances are you CAN bend light (what would THAT be called?) but unlike Pyro- and Cryo-PK, which are speeding up or slowing down the vibrations of atoms, there would be no Umbra-PK, because shadows are the absence of light, and while heat is an energy, light is matter.

Yes, you heard me, matter. Ever hear of photons? Matter.

(Which would technically make it PK anyway, haha.)

Just note that I'm not trying to make any new terms - I think, scientifically speaking, you should understand something before naming it. In THEORY, anything is possible. In PRACTICE, things are a bit more difficult.

So yeah, unless you're writing fiction, you should try to not name something you can't confirm. I think I'll stick to Sean's list.

(Sorry for the rant.)

Re: Kinesis this kinesis that kinesis... on Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:23 am

Theorist

Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 315

leemcgavinjoey wrote:

I think there are lots of types of -kinesis'. I just came to add this in because a forum was locked.. Sad

eh.....most are correct and do-able.....but there are some that are actually derived from other -kineses.... like the technokinesis thing....its actually micro-electrokinesis......

who the heck would waste their time typing electro-psychokinesis when electrokinesis is gramatically correct??

Posted on Sat Nov 04, 2006 11:51 am

Apollo

Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 1589

smart people.

What do you mean by grammatically correct? as far as I know, there is no difference in grammar between those....

Posted on Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:52 am

Theorist

Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 315

Apollo wrote:

smart people.

What do you mean by grammatically correct? as far as I know, there is no difference in grammar between those....

yea....tts the point....both are correct...and one is shorter.....so just use the short one...... makes sense? time = money...aint that the way some view "time"? typing shorter words save time.......

SO WHY WONT PSIPOG MORONS JUST ACCEPT THE MOST WIDELY USED DIALECT?!?! INTERNET SHORTHAND!!! FREAK IT!!

Posted on Sun Nov 05, 2006 4:10 pm

Apollo

Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 1589

Tell me where terms like "electrokinesis", "aquakinesis", and "geokinesis" are acceptable in the scientific world? What? Psionics isn't science? Well, what do you think paranormal researchers are? They are scientists who are attempting to discover how the paranormal works. Here is the definition of science:

Dictionary wrote:

The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena.

I see the terms Psychokinesis, Telepathy, Remote Viewing, and those sorts widely accepted. If you want to sound like you actually know what you are talking about, do the following:

1) Type out words and don't over capitalize

2) For god sakes, learn how to spell (or at least try)

3) It really wont kill you to type out about 4-5 more letters. You hardly post here at all anyway

4) If you don't like the way Psipog is run, leave. No one is keeping you here. Those are the rules and you will abide by them while you are in this community (for however long it will be up).

Even though I am no longer a moderator here, I still act anal about this. Respect the rules or leave.

Here is a link to help you on your next website you will hang around:

Click here

Enjoy and have a nice day.

Posted on Mon Nov 06, 2006 5:48 am

Theorist

Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 315

waste all the time u wan....punk....

and btw...tts a totally fluffy site.....as a ex-mod.....keep away from fluff

Posted on Mon Nov 06, 2006 6:32 pm

Apollo

Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 1589

that was 100% my point. thanks captain obvious.

Posted on Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:35 pm

Rahmid

Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 739

what? Widly accepted? I suggest you stay away from the internet junk heaps you hang out in to think that gibberish is widly accepted.

In shorter more polite words, it isn't popular, at ALL. Shocked

Rahmid

Posted on Tue Nov 07, 2006 12:09 am

Eldibs

Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 909

Sorry, I just had to point this out....

Quote:

and while heat is an energy, light is matter.

Yes, you heard me, matter. Ever hear of photons? Matter.

Actually, light isn't matter. Light is a form of energy. From Wikipedia:

Quote:

The photon is massless...

If it has no mass, then it has no matter, since mass is a measurement of the amount of matter in any given object.

But then again, since E=MC^2, all matter is energy anyways, so I guess it would be a moot point, wouldn't it?

Now, to the other discussion...

Quote:

what? Widly accepted? I suggest you stay away from the internet junk heaps you hang out in to think that gibberish is widly accepted.

In shorter more polite words, it isn't popular, at ALL.

Exactly. While it may be acceptable to use such gibberish on Yahoo Messenger, it's not acceptable here. This is a message board, not a chat room, you have plenty of time to type out your responses. Use that time to make your post coherent.

Quote:

I've still yet to hear of anyone actually using "chronokinesis" in any form, altering someone's perception of time, or time itself. I think it's pretty much impossible.

I've actually read about people using meditation to speed up or slow down their perception of time. Time didn't change at all, but to them, it seemed like it was going faster/slower. It doesn't sound that difficult, my perception of time changes constantly based on what I'm doing anyways.

Quote:

Karyokinesis... Supposedly a way to divide and replicate cells. ...
<insert a load of kinesis terms here>
...Umbrakinesis... Manipulating shadows
And so on...

Oh... my... God...

Posted on Sun Nov 19, 2006 12:26 pm

Psillama

Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 22

I would like to point out the error in a great deal of supposedly "widely accepted" terms.
For this let us seperate the words using cryo-pk as an example.

Cryopsychokinesis
Cryo-cold, ice, etc.
Psycho-mind
Alternate of psycho is tele-distance
and kinesis-move, manipulate, etc.

So cryopsychokinesis is manipulating cold with you mind from a distance.
however Cryokinesis, however cool it may sound, is simply refering to a refrigerator.

On the subject of cold I would also like to point out that there is no "cold" simply a lack of heat.

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

PsiPog.net Forum Index » Psychokinesis » Valid -Kinesis Terms! Read or your messages might be deleted

You must agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy to view this website. Click here to contact the webmaster.