If either the mother or baby has any telepathic aptitude at all, they almost certainly have a link already. As for the probable intent of your question, yes, telepathic communication with a child still in the womb is possible, both by the mother and by a third party.

If you are picking up other people's thoughts, a well-constructed Shield programmed to keep such thoughts out should solve the problem. Your other option is not to go so deep into trance, in which state you are more likely to pick up such broadcasts.

Empathy is part of telepathy, but being an empath does not mean you necessarily have any natural talent for the other parts of the category. There are several ways around the problem. The easiest is to learn to Send and Receive thoughts as though starting completely from scratch (ie, like anyone else trying to learn it), _but_ include a busrt of empathic sending at the same time you send the thought.

1 of 1 person found this question helpful

The sort of folk originally meant by the very localised slang term that got shortened to "natural" are relatively uncommon. It appears that highly talented psychics are also uncommon, as are highly talented pianists. As to the actual percentage, that is unknowable at this point; there has been no study extensive enough to give a percentage of the human population. The apparent "stats" are variable from place to place, and there is considerable disagreement as to what constitutes "talented" and/or "natural".

"Heavily"? No, not really. However, they do tend to carry _some_ imprinting of this sort.

By definition, "telepathy" is communication between two or more minds. It cannot be done solo. However, there are preliminary exercises which can make later telepathic attempts easier. One of these is to read silently while forming the words as clearly as you can in your mind, so you "hear" them....exactly the opposite of what you would want to do if you intended to increase your reading speed. Another is to picture objects in your mind; practice visualization.

Numbers are not generally good targets for most of the methods used within RV protocols. Usually, they do not "come through" well.

http://www.grillflame.com/lottery/project1/

Check that out ^

If she claims not to believe in such things, she probably does not want you to teach her. However, to get the definitive answer, ask _her_.

Some kinds of deliberately established links are dangerous. If you have to ask this question, you don't know enough about the subject to be trying it.

Some linking with people to whom you have strong emotional ties appears to be normal. Deliberately established links tend to be more intense than the average incidental link.

Establishing such a link without the consent of the other party is pretty much a hostile act. Some people will notice the link. Whether it is dangerous depends on the nature of the link and whether the other person chooses to do something about it.

The very intense links which _are_ decidedly dangerous are not likely to go unnoticed by either party. "Extreme emotional distress" is not the extent of possible damage. Deterioration of the personalities of both parties is one of the possibilities, which has been recorded, and appears to be permanent and irreversible.