How do you know anything online is legitimate? You don't. With tk, there are so many ways to fake it, even "live", that your best proof would be doing it yourself. And no, you don't have to believe in it, to do it.

0 of 1 person found this question helpful

Yes. Little things like "cardiac arrest".

1 of 1 person found this question helpful

Holding fire in your hand is likely to result in a nasty burn, unless you have a very good insulator between your hand and the flame. However, both flames and freezing are possible, with practice. If you can affect the temperature of a substance by a few degrees, continue what you're doing.

0 of 3 people found this question helpful

_If_ they run in your family, then _if_ you happened to inherit that particular trait, then you _might_ be more likely to reach a certain level of skill in them, if you work at it. However, that doesn't make it an advantage. Needing to learn to stop and/or control an ability that presents itself naturally is more of a nuissance than learning something by choice.

Could it be static electricity? Yes, depending on how you are approaching the pinwheel. Convection currents are another cause of "false-positives".

1 of 1 person found this question helpful

You have a few options:

1) Poke the buttons on the remote control with your mind. The "extend a tendril" approach is convenient for this.

2) Mess about with the electronics themselves, by any number of methods, micro or macro.

3) Poke the buttons or push the dials on the television itself, if it has such....some do, some don't.

The more advanced the device is, the easier it should be to affect. Old-fashioned black-and-white systems need brute force to turn their dials; up-to-this-millenium "tv-on-computer" bits can be messed with by microPK.

1 of 1 person found this question helpful

"How" and "why" are not established. It _is_ established, by fairly simple clinical means, that it happens. It could be a simple matter of "intense concentration", or it might be something more enigmatic.

There are blood tests for potassium and glucose levels. Measuring them before, during, and after telekinetic activity, and before, during, and after other kinds of activities is tedious, and involves a lot of poking with needles, but is not technically complicated.

Run enough of these tests with enough people, and it has not been difficult to establish that the activity affects the chemistry. It is rather more difficult to establish exactly what it is _about_ the activity that causes this effect, however.

"If you do A, B happens" is a _much_ easier thing to demonstrate than "If you do A, B happens _because_ of C by means of D".

And, for the record, "hypokalemia" _is_ low blood potassium, rather than "caused by". Likewise, "hypoglycemia" describes the condition of having low blood glucose levels, as opposed to being caused by same.

1) It doesn't appear to matter. The two skills do not appear to affect each other much.

2) Close enough.

No problem

No

Yep, that's normal. It gets more "regular" as you have more experience at it, generally.

1 of 1 person found this question helpful